🗞️ Key Takeaways:
- The Federal High Court in Abuja has admitted as evidence a ₦1 billion damages judgment awarded to Nnamdi Kanu by the Abia State High Court over the 2017 military invasion of his home.
- The court proceedings are part of Kanu’s ongoing trial for treasonable felony and terrorism.
- A Department of State Services (DSS) operative, identified as “BBB,” testified that the DSS did not arrest Kanu in Kenya, contradicting previous allegations.
- The court session included the admission of additional judgments related to Kanu’s case.
- Justice James Omotosho warned Kanu’s legal team against unprofessional conduct during the trial.
📰 Full Story:
In a significant development in the ongoing trial of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), the Federal High Court in Abuja has admitted as evidence a ₦1 billion damages judgment previously awarded to him.
This judgment, delivered by Justice Benson Anya of the Abia State High Court, declared the 2017 military invasion of Kanu’s residence in Afara-Ukwu, Umuahia, as illegal and unconstitutional, citing violations of his fundamental rights.
During the court session, a DSS operative, referred to as “BBB,” testified that the agency did not arrest Kanu in Kenya, as previously alleged. He emphasized that the DSS operates solely within Nigeria’s borders.
The court also admitted additional judgments related to Kanu’s case, further strengthening his defense.
Justice James Omotosho cautioned Kanu’s legal team against unprofessional conduct, highlighting concerns over the dissemination of sensitive court information on social media.
🗨️ Top Comments from X (formerly Twitter):
@ChidiOkafor: “Justice delayed is justice denied. Glad to see some progress in Kanu’s case.”
@Adaeze_Naija: “The DSS denying involvement in Kanu’s arrest raises more questions than answers.”
@EmekaWrites: “₦1 billion is a significant sum. Will the government comply?”
@NgoziHumanRights: “This case is a litmus test for Nigeria’s commitment to human rights.”
@LegalEagleNG: “The court’s warning to Kanu’s lawyers is a reminder of the importance of professionalism.”
@BiafraVoice: “Admitting the judgment as evidence is a win for Kanu’s defense team.”
@TruthSeeker: “The truth about Kanu’s arrest in Kenya remains elusive.”
@JusticeMatters: “This trial has far-reaching implications for Nigeria’s legal system.”
@NaijaObserver: “Transparency in this case is crucial for public trust.”
@UnityFirst: “Kanu’s case continues to polarize opinions across the country.”
The admission of the ₦1 billion judgment as evidence in Nnamdi Kanu’s trial marks a pivotal moment in his legal battle. As proceedings continue, the case remains a focal point in discussions about justice and human rights in Nigeria.
📰 Source:
This report is based on information from Nairametrics, BBC Pidgin, and Per Second News.
