Legal Battle in Nigeria: Falana’s Firm Defends Sowore
Femi Falana’s chambers have called for charges against human rights activist Omoyele Sowore to be dropped by Attorney General Lateef Fagbemi, labelling the case unconstitutional. Filed by IGP Egbetokun, the 16-count cybercrime charge against Sowore criticizes his remarks on social media against the inspector-general.
The legal move follows accusations that President Tinubu’s administration politically motivated the charges against Sowore, a prior presidential candidate. Critics highlight breaches of the Nigeria Police Act and the Cybercrimes Act amendments which safeguard free speech, urging swift withdrawal of the charges.
Key Takeaways:
- Femi Falana’s chambers argue Sowore’s charges violate Nigeria’s Constitution and African Charter on Human Rights.
- The Cybercrimes Act amendment in 2024 aims to safeguard freedom of expression, questioning Sowore’s charges.
- Falana calls for the exercise of Attorney General powers to ensure justice and prevent legal abuse.
For in-depth analysis, visit the original Sahara Reporters.
Question: Do you believe these legal actions signify an attempt to curb freedom of expression in Nigeria? Share your thoughts.
